Think Dirty vs Yuka: two ratings that run in opposite directions

Think Dirty and Yuka both scan a barcode and both let the riskiest ingredient set a cosmetic’s result, but their scales run in opposite directions. Yuka scores out of 100, where higher is better; Think Dirty’s Dirty Meter tops out at 10, where higher is worse. Yuka also scores food; Think Dirty does not.

This page compares the two methods as each app describes them, not the two companies. It covers what each rating is built from, what each covers, what each costs, and which fits which shopper. Neither is treated as the default, and neither is called inaccurate.

The same rule, on two opposite scales

Both apps use a worst-ingredient rule for cosmetics. Yuka says the score is based on the level of the highest-risk ingredient present; Think Dirty says a product is rated no lower than the highest rating of any single ingredient. One risky name decides the band in both, whatever else is in the bottle.

YukaThink Dirty
Direction of the scale
Yuka 0 to 100, higher is better
Think Dirty Dirty Meter up to 10, higher is worse
One high-risk ingredient
Yuka Score turns red, below 25/100
Think Dirty Product rated no lower than that ingredient
One moderate-risk ingredient as the worst
Yuka Score below 50/100
Think Dirty Product rated no lower than that ingredient
Several high-rated ingredients
Yuka Stays in the red band
Think Dirty Product set to 10
Exceptions to the worst-ingredient rule
Yuka Not described on its cosmetic method page
Think Dirty Case by case for certified products and for 4–7 rated ingredients under 5%
Data as a table
What happensYukaThink Dirty
Direction of the scale0 to 100, higher is betterDirty Meter up to 10, higher is worse
One high-risk ingredientScore turns red, below 25/100Product rated no lower than that ingredient
One moderate-risk ingredient as the worstScore below 50/100Product rated no lower than that ingredient
Several high-rated ingredientsStays in the red bandProduct set to 10
Exceptions to the worst-ingredient ruleNot described on its cosmetic method pageCase by case for certified products and for 4–7 rated ingredients under 5%

A 9 means opposite things in the two apps. On Think Dirty it is close to the worst rating; on a Yuka-style scale out of 100 it would be close to the floor. Reading both without checking the direction is the most common way to misread them.

The shared rule has a shared consequence. A long, plain formula with one flagged preservative can land in a worse band than a short formula with several moderate ingredients, because neither app averages; the worst name wins. That is a design choice both make openly, not a flaw either hides.

What each rating is built from

Each app classifies ingredients from its own sources. Yuka groups cosmetic ingredients into four risk levels — risk-free, low, moderate and high — by potential effects on health and the environment. Think Dirty rates ingredients from publicly available data released by non-profit and government agencies in North America.

YukaThink Dirty
Where ingredient ratings come from
Yuka Yuka’s own risk classification by potential health and environmental effects
Think Dirty Publicly available data from non-profit and government agencies in North America
Ingredients not yet rated
Yuka Not described on the cosmetic method page
Think Dirty A separate band for ingredients not yet rated
Undisclosed fragrance
Yuka Not described on the cosmetic method page
Think Dirty Treated as a component that cannot be evaluated
Food
Yuka A separate formula: 60% nutrition, 30% additives, 10% organic
Think Dirty Not covered
Data as a table
AxisYukaThink Dirty
Where ingredient ratings come fromYuka’s own risk classification by potential health and environmental effectsPublicly available data from non-profit and government agencies in North America
Ingredients not yet ratedNot described on the cosmetic method pageA separate band for ingredients not yet rated
Undisclosed fragranceNot described on the cosmetic method pageTreated as a component that cannot be evaluated
FoodA separate formula: 60% nutrition, 30% additives, 10% organicNot covered

Different sources are why the two apps can disagree on the same lotion. If one ingredient sits in a higher band in one app than in the other, the worst-ingredient rule carries that difference to the whole product, so a single classification can separate the two results by a full band.

Coverage, price and account

Yuka covers food and personal care in one app; Think Dirty’s listing names skincare, cosmetic, hair care, personal care, household, baby and pet items, and its FAQ says it does not input chips, water, soda or basic food. Both are free to download with paid tiers on top.

28 million

Yuka's own count of US users, against 85 million worldwide and 6 million products rated. Think Dirty's App Store listing cites over 8 million users in total.Yuka press kit; Think Dirty App Store listing, 2026
YukaThink Dirty
Shelves covered
Yuka Food and personal care
Think Dirty Skincare, cosmetics, hair and personal care, household, baby and pet; no basic food
How you start
Yuka Scan a barcode
Think Dirty Scan a barcode or search the database
Free use
Yuka Free app with in-app purchases
Think Dirty Free to download with premium features
Paid tier
Yuka Annual Premium from $10 in the US
Think Dirty Premium from $2.99 a month or $28.99 a year; All Access from $6.49 a month or $48.99 a year, US prices in its FAQ
Account
Yuka Registration required
Think Dirty Used for premium features and product submissions, per its FAQ
Data as a table
AxisYukaThink Dirty
Shelves coveredFood and personal careSkincare, cosmetics, hair and personal care, household, baby and pet; no basic food
How you startScan a barcodeScan a barcode or search the database
Free useFree app with in-app purchasesFree to download with premium features
Paid tierAnnual Premium from $10 in the USPremium from $2.99 a month or $28.99 a year; All Access from $6.49 a month or $48.99 a year, US prices in its FAQ
AccountRegistration requiredUsed for premium features and product submissions, per its FAQ

Prices are the vendors’ own, read on 12 October 2026, and tiers change without notice. The Think Dirty alternatives comparison sets the app beside three other cosmetic tools, and alternatives to Yuka does the same on the food side.

Which app fits which shopper

The choice follows from the shopping, not from which app is better in the abstract. A shopper buying groceries and skincare in one trip needs an app that reads both; a shopper focused on personal care alone can choose either and should pick the scale they read without thinking.

You shop food and skincare together

Only Yuka covers both shelves. Its food score uses a different formula from its cosmetic score, so a number on a cereal and a number on a cream are not measured the same way.

You only check personal care

Both apply the same worst-ingredient rule. Think Dirty also rates household, baby and pet items, which Yuka does not advertise.

You want to see why, not just a band

Both apps list the flagged ingredients behind a result. Neither prints the regulatory document behind an ingredient, because neither result is a regulatory rating.

Both apps sit in a wider field. Yuka against EWG’s app adds a third scale, 1 to 10 with 1 as best, and the ingredient checker apps compared set five tools side by side on what each reads.

Where LabelPeek sits in this

LabelPeek is not a barcode app, so it is not a third entry in this comparison. It reads an ingredient list you paste and matches it against a published list printed on the same page, reporting what matched, what did not, and what it could not read at all.

LabelPeek

Matches the ingredient text against a list published in full beside the checker, and reports how many names it could not recognise instead of rounding the result to clean.

Best for A label you can read, when you want to see the list behind each flag rather than a band.

Where it falls short No barcode catalogue and no single score, so a sealed product whose list you cannot see gives it nothing to work with, and two products cannot be ranked.

Think Dirty and Yuka

Both start from a barcode and a stored product record, which makes a two-second scan at the shelf possible and lets each app rank products against each other.

Best for Shopping at speed, when scanning the box beats reading the back of it.

The pore-clogging ingredients checker is the LabelPeek tool closest to what these apps do for skincare, with one difference that matters: the list it matches against is printed in full under the tool, with a version date.

Common questions

Which is better for skincare, Think Dirty or Yuka
Think Dirty and Yuka both rate skincare by letting the riskiest ingredient set the product's result, so neither is better in general. Think Dirty covers personal care, household, baby and pet items; Yuka also scores food. The choice turns on whether you shop both aisles and which scale you find easier to read.
How accurate is the Think Dirty app
Think Dirty's accuracy rests on its published method rather than on a regulator. Its methodology says ingredient ratings come from publicly available data released by non-profit and government agencies in North America, and that a product is rated no lower than its highest-rated ingredient, with case-by-case exceptions for certified products and small amounts.
Does Think Dirty scan food like Yuka does
Think Dirty does not scan food. Its FAQ lists chips, water, soda and basic food products among the things it will not add, and its App Store listing describes skincare, hair care and cosmetic products. Yuka scans the barcodes of food and personal care products in one app and scores food on a separate nutrition-led formula.
Why does the same lotion get different results in Think Dirty and Yuka
The same lotion can land differently because each app classifies ingredients from its own sources and builds its own risk bands. Yuka groups ingredients into four risk levels by potential health and environmental effects; Think Dirty rates them from North American agency data. A single ingredient rated differently can move the whole product.
When is neither Think Dirty nor Yuka the right tool
Neither app helps when the product is not in its database, when a reformulated product still carries an old record, or when the question is regulatory rather than a rating. Both start from a barcode and a stored product record, so a label you can read but the app has never seen returns nothing.

Sources

Every factual claim on this page that can be checked against a document is listed here with the document it comes from.

  1. How are cosmetic products evaluated? Yuka Help Centre · help.yuka.ioThat Yuka classifies cosmetic ingredients into four risk categories by potential effects on health and the environment, and that the score is based on the highest-risk ingredient present — red and below 25/100 with a high-risk ingredient, below 50/100 with a moderate-risk one.
  2. How are food products rated? Yuka Help Centre · help.yuka.ioThat Yuka scores food on a separate method — 60% nutritional quality based on Nutri-Score, 30% additives, 10% organic — with a high-risk additive capping the product at 49/100.
  3. Yuka — Food & Cosmetic Scanner on the App Store Yuca SAS / Apple App Store · apps.apple.comThat Yuka is a free app with in-app purchases that scans the barcodes of food and personal care products and recommends alternatives when a product rates poorly.
  4. How much does membership cost? Yuka Help Centre · help.yuka.ioThat Yuka's annual Premium subscription starts at $10 in the US.
  5. Why do I have to register to use Yuka? Yuka Help Centre · help.yuka.ioThat Yuka requires registration, explaining it as necessary to secure user contributions in a collaborative app.
  6. Yuka press kit — key figures Yuka · yuka.ioYuka's own figures of 28 million users in the US, 85 million worldwide and 6 million products rated.
  7. Our methodology — how we rate ingredients Think Dirty · thinkdirtyapp.comThat ingredient ratings rest on publicly available data from non-profit and government agencies in North America, that a product is by default rated no lower than its highest-rated ingredient and is set to 10 when several ingredients rate high, the case-by-case exceptions for certified products and for 4–7 rated ingredients under 5%, and the band for ingredients not yet rated.
  8. Think Dirty Help Centre (FAQ) Think Dirty · thinkdirtyapp.comThe Premium and All Access subscription tiers and their US prices, and that chips, water, soda and basic food products are among the things Think Dirty does not input.
  9. Think Dirty – Shop Clean on the App Store Think Dirty Inc. / Apple App Store · apps.apple.comThat Think Dirty is free to download with premium features, works from a barcode scanner or search, names skincare, cosmetic, hair care, personal care, household, baby and pet items, and cites over 8 million users.